Bipartisanship in Action: Case Studies of Success, Inside and Outside the U.S.

Bipartisanship—the art of opposing political parties finding agreement —is often painted as a relic of the past. In recent years, deep political divisions have hardened on Capitol Hill.To many disillusioned voters, the idea of meaningful cooperation can feel like wishful thinking. But recent history, from across international waters to here at home, proves that it doesn’t have to be that way. From national security reforms to public health initiatives, leaders across ideological divides have proven that cooperation is possible and essential.

GET INVOLVED: Sign up to receive emails from No Labels

Let’s dive into the case studies of notable bipartisanship from the U.S. and abroad, lessons learned from them, and then analyze the common themes that emerged.

Bipartisanship in the United States

  1. The Post-9/11 Homeland Security Act (2002)

  • Context: After the September 11 attacks, there was widespread recognition that the U.S. needed a more unified and coordinated approach to national security.
  • Key Figures: President George W. Bush (R), Senator Joe Lieberman (D), Senator Carl Levin (D), and bipartisan congressional leaders.
  • Policy Impact:
    • Merged 22 federal agencies, including FEMA, the Secret Service, and U.S. Customs, into the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
    • Created the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to improve airport and airline security.
    • Introduced intelligence-sharing mechanisms between agencies to prevent future attacks.
  • Challenges & Criticism:
    • Civil liberties concerns arose over surveillance and law enforcement powers.
    • Bureaucratic inefficiencies due to the massive restructuring of government agencies.
    • Ongoing debates over immigration enforcement under DHS.
  • Outcome: Despite concerns, DHS remains a central pillar of U.S. national security.

Lesson Learned: National crises often foster bipartisanship by highlighting common threats, but ongoing oversight is necessary to maintain the balance between security and civil liberties.

  1. The Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) (1997)

  • Context: In the 1990s, millions of children fell into a healthcare coverage gap—with families too poor for private insurance but not poor enough to qualify for Medicaid.
  • Key Figures: Senator Ted Kennedy (D) and Senator Orrin Hatch (R).
  • Policy Impact:
    • Provided federal funding to states to offer health insurance to low-income children.
    • Expanded Medicaid, allowing more families to qualify for coverage.
    • Led to a sharp decline in the number of uninsured children in the U.S.
  • Challenges & Criticism:
    • Some conservatives opposed the expansion of government-funded healthcare.
    • Funding battles occasionally threatened the program, such as in 2007 when President Bush vetoed an expansion bill (later restored under President Obama).
  • Outcome: CHIP has remained a bipartisan success story, with continued support under multiple administrations.

Lesson Learned: Bipartisanship is easier when policies focus on universally supported values, such as children’s health and well-being.

  1. The 1996 Welfare Reform Act

  • Context: Welfare dependency and concerns about government assistance programs led to a push for major social policy reform.
  • Key Figures: President Bill Clinton (D) and House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R).
  • Policy Impact:
    • Replaced Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).
    • Introduced work requirements for welfare recipients, aiming to reduce long-term dependency.
    • Gave states more control over welfare programs through block grants.
  • Challenges & Criticism:
    • Supporters credit the law with reducing poverty and increasing workforce participation.
    • Critics argue it left some vulnerable families without sufficient support, especially during economic downturns.
  • Outcome: Many of the reforms remain in place today, though some policies have been revisited in light of economic shifts.

Lesson Learned: Bipartisanship often requires compromise—Clinton had to navigate opposition within his own party while Republicans had to adjust their demands to pass lasting legislation.

  1. The 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

  • Context: Infrastructure had been a long-standing bipartisan priority, but previous efforts to pass a large-scale funding package had failed.
  • Key Figures: President Joe Biden (D) and a bipartisan group of Senators, including Rob Portman (R), Kyrsten Sinema (D), and Susan Collins (R).
  • Policy Impact:
    • Provided $1.2 trillion over a decade for roads, bridges, public transit, broadband expansion, clean energy, and water systems.
    • Included funding for rural areas, addressing concerns from Republican lawmakers.
    • Created jobs and stimulated economic growth through public works projects.
  • Challenges & Criticism:
    • Some progressives felt the bill didn’t go far enough in addressing climate change and other social spending needs.
    • Some conservatives opposed the spending levels, priorities and potential impact on the national debt.
  • Outcome: The bill passed with significant bipartisan support and is being implemented nationwide.

Lesson Learned: Infrastructure remains one of the few policy areas where cross-party cooperation is possible because of the direct, tangible benefits for all communities.

  1. The 2018 First Step Act (Criminal Justice Reform)

  • Context: Concerns over excessive incarceration and disproportionate sentencing for nonviolent drug offenses led to calls for reform.
  • Key Figures: President Donald Trump (R), Senators Dick Durbin (D) and Chuck Grassley (R), and advocacy groups across the political spectrum.
  • Policy Impact:
    • Reduced mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug offenders.
    • Expanded early release programs and rehabilitative services.
    • Allowed judges more discretion in sentencing, particularly for low-level offenders.
  • Challenges & Criticism:
    • Some conservatives worried about being “soft on crime.”
    • Some progressives felt the bill didn’t go far enough in addressing systemic issues in policing and incarceration.
  • Outcome: The law has led to thousands of sentence reductions and early releases, with continued bipartisan support for further reforms.

Lesson Learned: Criminal justice reform demonstrates that bipartisan cooperation is possible when both sides recognize moral and economic benefits.

Find more bipartisan examples in the United States with this list of case studies.

International Case Studies

  1. The Good Friday Agreement (1998, Northern Ireland)

  • Ended decades of sectarian violence between Protestant unionists (who wanted Northern Ireland to remain part of the U.K.) and Catholic nationalists (who sought unification with Ireland).
  • Brokered with the help of the U.K., Irish governments, and U.S. mediation (notably, Senator George Mitchell played a key role).
  • Created a new power-sharing government where both communities had representation.
  • Established mechanisms for disarmament, police reform, and cross-border cooperation.
  • Despite challenges—including periodic political gridlock and Brexit-related tensions—it has largely maintained peace.

Lesson Learned: Lasting peace requires continuous dialogue, trust-building, and institutions that fairly represent opposing sides.

  1. Germany’s Grand Coalitions

  • Germany has a history of “Grand Coalitions” between its two biggest parties: the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU).
  • These coalitions helped maintain political stability, particularly in times of crisis, such as the 2008 financial crash and the European migrant crisis.
  • Notable examples include:
    • 2005-2009 & 2013-2021: Angela Merkel’s leadership saw CDU and SPD working together to enact economic and social policies.
    • 2018 agreement: The SPD joined a Merkel-led coalition in exchange for key social policy reforms, including higher minimum wages and pension protections.
  • While such arrangements can cause voter disillusionment (some argue they weaken opposition), they have allowed for pragmatic policy making in a deeply divided political landscape.

Lesson Learned: Shared governance can create policy continuity, stabilize fragile political climates, and build resilience during crises.

  1. South Africa’s Post-Apartheid Transition (1990s)

  • Key Figures: Nelson Mandela (leader of the anti-apartheid movement) and F.W. de Klerk (last apartheid-era president of South Africa).
  • Process: Negotiations led to the dismantling of apartheid, culminating in the first multiracial elections in 1994.
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC): Rather than resorting to retributive justice, South Africa adopted a restorative justice approach, allowing for amnesty in exchange for truth-telling about past crimes.
  • Political Collaboration: Mandela’s government included former apartheid officials in key positions to ensure a peaceful transition.
  • Challenges: Despite its successes, post-apartheid South Africa has struggled with economic inequality and governance issues.

Lesson Learned: Successful bipartisanship often requires personal courage, strategic compromise, and a commitment to reconciliation over revenge.

  1. The European Union’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

  • The EU, despite its often slow decision-making due to diverse national interests, came together for an unprecedented coordinated response:
    • Recovery Fund: A €750 billion ($800 billion) recovery package, jointly financed by all member states, to help pandemic-hit economies.
    • Vaccine Strategy: Centralized vaccine procurement to prevent bidding wars between member states, ensuring equitable distribution.
    • Temporary Suspension of Fiscal Rules: Allowed governments to increase spending to support businesses and citizens.
  • Despite some delays in vaccine rollouts, the EU’s unified response prevented economic collapse and showed how supranational cooperation can work.

Lesson Learned: Crisis can drive unity, but strong institutions and shared economic interests are critical to effective collaboration.

Key Takeaways

There are common themes for cooperation. Here are some key insights based on these instances of working together:

  • Crisis as a Catalyst: National emergencies often force cooperation, as seen with the Homeland Security Act.
  • Shared Values Matter: Policies that center on widely supported goals, like children’s health (CHIP) or infrastructure, tend to gain bipartisan backing.
  • Compromise is Essential: Major legislative victories (like welfare reform) often require each side to give ground while maintaining core priorities.
  • Tangible Benefits Win Support: Policies that provide clear, direct benefits to citizens, such as job creation or criminal justice fixes, have higher chances of bipartisan success.

Bipartisanship is not just an ideal—it’s a proven strategy for governance. While the political climate often discourages cooperation, our past shows what our present can be—leaders prioritizing progress over partisanship and country over party to make real change happen. The question isn’t whether bipartisanship is possible—it’s whether today’s leaders are willing to pursue it.

What are you waiting for? Join our movement today to be part of history: Support us with a donation, get involved with volunteer efforts, or sign up for emails for emails as we solve problems for everyday Americans.